Skip to main content

Financial Help Matcher

What kind of financial help actually fits you? Ranked by fit for your assets, needs, and how hands-on you want to be.

Educational tool, not investment advice. Before hiring anyone, verify fiduciary status and how they’re paid — Form ADV Part 2 is public and readable.

Your situationa few basics — results rank instantly, no account, no AI

Try an example:
Refine resultsoptional — rankings update instantly
9
options ranked
81
top fit
24%
confidence
DIY comfort, main need, fee sensitivity
would sharpen this most
1

Advice-only flat-fee planner

Pays for advice, not assets — you keep the keys to the accounts.

81
Fit
85 Access
Strong match

The gate: No asset minimum — but the good ones run waitlists.

  • Incentive alignment: no AUM, no commissions — the fee is the whole business model
  • Cost at your asset level: a fixed annual fee often undercuts 1% AUM from $400k upward
  • Handles your complexity: full-scope planning: taxes, equity comp, retirement, insurance review
  • You implement the recommendations yourself
  • A small (but growing) corner of the industry — expect waitlists

Sharper with: DIY comfort, fee sensitivity

2

One-time comprehensive plan

A full financial plan as a project: fixed price, defined deliverable.

75
Fit
90 Access
Worth a look

The gate: Open engagement — pay the project fee, no ongoing minimums.

  • Incentive alignment: project pricing; no ongoing pull on your assets
  • Cost at your asset level: one defined fee instead of a percentage forever
  • Handles your complexity: covers the whole picture once — retirement, tax, insurance, estate touchpoints
  • The plan is only as good as your follow-through
  • Refresh it after major life events — it goes stale

Sharper with: main need, engagement style

3

Hourly CFP

Buy exactly as much advice as you need, by the hour.

74
Fit
92 Access
Worth a look

The gate: No minimums at all — works at any asset level.

  • Cost at your asset level: a few hundred dollars can answer the question that actually worries you
  • Incentive alignment: clock-based billing has the fewest hidden incentives in the industry
  • Scope creep bills by the hour — agree on scope up front
  • Not built for ongoing management

Sharper with: main need

4

Fee-only fiduciary RIA (AUM)

The classic ongoing relationship: they manage, you live your life.

73
Fit
55 Access
Worth a look

The gate: Most set $100k–$500k minimums; some waive them for planning-only clients.

  • Matches your DIY comfort: they trade, rebalance, and call you — not the reverse
  • Handles your complexity: built for multi-account, tax-aware, life-event-heavy situations
  • Incentive alignment: fee-only fiduciary duty, though AUM still rewards gathering assets
  • 1% of assets compounds — always convert it to a dollar figure per year
  • Ask what you get beyond portfolio management; that’s where the value hides

Sharper with: Investable assets, engagement style

5

Wealth manager / private client

Coordinated investments, tax, estate, and lending under one roof.

69
Fit
25 Access
Worth a look

The gate: Typically $1M+ investable minimum; the marquee shops start at $2M–$5M.

  • Matches your DIY comfort: white-glove: they run the process and bring in the specialists
  • Handles your complexity: the only tier built for business sales, trusts, and multi-entity money
  • Highest all-in cost of any option here
  • Bank-affiliated shops may sell proprietary products — verify fiduciary status in writing

Sharper with: Investable assets, estate needs

6

Hybrid robo + human CFP

Automated portfolio with a planner a video call away.

68
Fit
88 Access
Worth a look

The gate: Low minimums — typically around $25k.

  • Cost at your asset level: meaningfully cheaper than a traditional advisor relationship
  • Matches your DIY comfort: a human to call before big decisions, without full-service pricing
  • You get a rotating bench of planners, not one who knows you
  • Advice depth varies — probe with a hard question before signing up

Sharper with: DIY comfort

7

Robo-advisor

Automated diversified portfolios at near-index-fund cost.

64
Fit
96 Access
Worth a look

The gate: No minimums — opens in minutes.

  • Cost at your asset level: 0.25% or less — an order of magnitude under a human manager
  • No human judgment when life gets complicated
  • Tax-loss-harvesting marketing tends to oversell the benefit

Sharper with: Investable assets

8

Workplace / 401(k) advice service

The advice you may already be paying for through your plan.

62
Fit
98 Access
Worth a look

The gate: Zero friction — it’s attached to your existing account.

  • Cost at your asset level: often free or already bundled into plan fees
  • Scope usually ends at the plan’s edge — outside accounts are invisible to it
  • Conflict profiles vary by provider; ask how the advisors are paid

Sharper with: main need

9

DIY + target-date fund

The honest baseline every option above must beat.

61
Fit
100 Access
Worth a look

The gate: Always available — the only gate is your own follow-through.

  • Cost at your asset level: a single fund at ~0.10% doing 90% of what most people need
  • Incentive alignment: nobody is paid to steer you anywhere
  • You are the behavior management — the real fee is panic-selling in a downturn

Sharper with: DIY comfort

Researched recommendations are coming

This ranking matches you to a TYPE of help, instantly and mechanically. A research layer is planned on top: real firms and planners matching your profile, fee benchmarks, and public-record checks (Form ADV, BrokerCheck).

Find real candidates near me
Fee-only planners and RIAs matching your profile
Benchmark the fees
What your asset level should pay in each model
Prep the first meeting
The questions that expose misalignment in the first call

Planned — the instant ranking above never waits on it. Tell us which research you’d want first.

Educational only — not investment advice, not a recommendation of any firm or product. Verify fees and fiduciary status directly. Runs entirely in your browser; nothing you type is stored on our servers.